Secure2Go vs SoloProtect
SoloProtect scores 43 points higher than Secure2Go in lone worker and man-down solutions on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: SOS button with alarm follow-up, smartphone app and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Secure2Go | SoloProtect |
|---|---|---|
| Lone worker and man-down solutions | 50 /100 | 93 /100 |
| Automatic man-down or fall detection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SOS button with alarm follow-up | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Monitoring by a 24/7 alarm centre | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Dedicated wearable device (not only a smartphone) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Smartphone app | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
Secure2Go
Organisations that want the device, man-down alarm and alarm follow-up as one service.
-
SoloProtect
Organisations that want the device or app and 24/7 alarm handling from one vendor.