Skip to content

Shyfter vs T-Report

Shyfter scores 14 points higher than T-Report in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.

Where do they differ?

On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.

No source for at least one of the two: more than one registration method. Ask the vendor.

Editor's note

Shyfter and T-Report are both Belgian tools that combine scheduling and time registration. Shyfter focuses on staff scheduling with changing rosters (Shyfter, staff scheduling), T-Report on scheduling and work orders for field teams (T-Report). At both, the Checkinatwork or CIAO feature is a paid option without a public price: Shyfter, T-Report.

Data per criterion Shyfter T-Report
Checkinatwork apps 100 /100 86 /100
Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Automatic submission to the NSSO ✓ Yes✓ Yes
More than one registration method ✓ YesInsufficient data
Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Time registration in the same tool ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Works in Dutch and French ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Price public on the website ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Time tracking apps 100 /100 100 /100
Mobile time clock (app) ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Scheduling in the same tool ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Also Checkinatwork/CIAO ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Works in Dutch and French ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Price public on the website ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Registration methods app, qrapp, gps
Languages NL, FR, ENNL, FR, EN
Price from €39 / maand (Time tracking-plan; Check In&Out @Work is een betalende optie zonder publieke prijs)€7,6 / persoon/maand (basisabonnement; Check-in@Work en Check-in/Out zijn betalende opties zonder publieke prijs)