Shyfter vs WerfCheck
Shyfter scores 21 points higher than WerfCheck in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Shyfter meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Shyfter | WerfCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 100 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, qr | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | €39 / maand (Time tracking-plan; Check In&Out @Work is een betalende optie zonder publieke prijs) | €5 / gebruiker/maand |
-
Shyfter
Cleaning companies and shift work with changing rosters.
-
WerfCheck
Small Flemish construction companies looking for a simple app without hardware.