ArchiSnapper vs T-Report
T-Report scores 22 points higher than ArchiSnapper in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: more than one registration method, link with a payroll provider (social secretariat), time registration in the same tool and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | ArchiSnapper | T-Report |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 64 /100 | 86 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, web | app, gps |
| Languages | FR, EN, NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | €7,6 / persoon/maand (basisabonnement; Check-in@Work en Check-in/Out zijn betalende opties zonder publieke prijs) |
-
ArchiSnapper
Architects, site managers and safety coordinators who already create site reports in ArchiSnapper.
-
T-Report
Construction, installation and service companies that want scheduling, hours and Checkinatwork in one tool, with export to Acerta, Partena, Group S or Liantis.