CGM OXYGEN vs KineQuick
KineQuick scores 40 points higher than CGM OXYGEN in physiotherapy practice software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: patients book appointments online, works in the cloud, without your own server and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | CGM OXYGEN | KineQuick |
|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapy practice software | 60 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Link with eHealth and MyCareNet (eAttest, eFact) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Patients book appointments online | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app (also for home visits) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in the cloud, without your own server | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, FR |
| Price from | Unknown | €66 / praktijk/maand (1 kinesitherapeut, excl. btw, jaarcontract) |
-
CGM OXYGEN
Physiotherapists who also want to consult their diary and records on mobile via a web app.
-
KineQuick
Physiotherapists who let patients book themselves 24/7 and want to work from any device.