Cooperlink vs Trimble Connect
Cooperlink scores 23 points higher than Trimble Connect in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: document management according to ISO 19650, data in the EU and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Cooperlink | Trimble Connect |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 85 /100 | 62 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
Cooperlink
Contractors and clients that want to manage document flows and BIM coordination across several parties and existing tools.
-
Trimble Connect
Steel construction, prefab and concrete companies that work with Tekla or other Trimble software.