FieldBuddy vs Workshaker
FieldBuddy and Workshaker score the same in work order apps for installers. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | FieldBuddy | Workshaker |
|---|---|---|
| Work order apps for installers | 92 /100 | 92 /100 |
| Digital work order with customer signature | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Technician scheduling in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Invoice from the work order | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN | NL, EN |
| Price from | €29 / gebruiker/maand (Go, jaarlijks, minimum 5 gebruikers) | €9,5 / buitendienstmedewerker/maand (jaarlijks, bovenop een Robaws-abonnement) |
-
FieldBuddy
Service and maintenance organisations with five or more technicians.
-
Workshaker
Robaws users that want a separate work order app for their technicians.