GeoDynamics vs Hilti ON!Track
GeoDynamics scores 30 points higher than Hilti ON!Track in construction equipment telematics on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: track fuel consumption and geofence and theft alarms. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | GeoDynamics | Hilti ON!Track |
|---|---|---|
| Construction equipment telematics | 92 /100 | 62 /100 |
| Machines from different brands in one platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Record operating hours and machine usage | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Track fuel consumption | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Geofence and theft alarms | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Open API or integrations with other software | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Tool and asset tracking | 75 /100 | 75 /100 |
| Track tools with tags (BLE, RFID or QR) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| GPS trackers for valuable equipment | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app to check out and hand over equipment | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Plan and track inspections and maintenance | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Open API or integrations with other software | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, badge, terminal, api, qr, web | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
GeoDynamics
Construction and installation companies that want presence, time and vehicles in one system.
-
Hilti ON!Track
Construction companies that want tools and heavy equipment in the same asset register.