GeoDynamics vs Share@Work
Share@Work scores 7 points higher than GeoDynamics in contractor management software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: online safety induction, withholding obligation check (NSSO and tax authorities) and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | GeoDynamics | Share@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Contractor management software | 62 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Prequalification of contractors | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Tracking of certificates and expiry dates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration and access on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Online safety induction | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Withholding obligation check (NSSO and tax authorities) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Site access control systems | 69 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, badge, terminal, api, qr, web | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
GeoDynamics
Construction and installation companies that want presence, time and vehicles in one system.
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.