Skip to content

Alternatives to Share@Work

  • Contractor management software 69 /100
  • Site access control systems 69 /100
Request a quote

The highest scoring alternative to Share@Work in contractor management software is 9ID, with 77/100 on our published criteria.

Contractor management software

  1. 1
    9ID

    Manufacturing and logistics sites with many external contractors and drivers that want to automate verification and access.

    77 /100 Compare with 9ID →
  2. 2
    Onyx One

    Industrial and chemical sites that want to qualify, train and register contractors before they pass the gate.

    77 /100 Compare with Onyx One →
  3. 3
    GeoDynamics

    Construction and installation companies that want presence, time and vehicles in one system.

    62 /100 Compare with GeoDynamics →
  4. 4
    Zen

    Main contractors that want to follow up attendance, subcontractors and access on large sites together.

    62 /100 Compare with Zen →
  5. 5
    Traxxeo Check In At Work

    Medium-sized and large contractors that want to manage attendance within a wider site management platform.

    38 /100 Compare with Traxxeo Check In At Work →
  6. 6
    Quentic

    Industrial sites that want to digitise safety instructions for external parties within their EHS platform.

    15 /100 Compare with Quentic →

Site access control systems

  1. 1
    All-Connects Checkin@Work

    Construction companies that want to pay per registration and combine different registration methods per site.

    92 /100 Compare with All-Connects Checkin@Work →
  2. 2
    Traxxeo Check In At Work

    Medium-sized and large contractors that want to manage attendance within a wider site management platform.

    92 /100 Compare with Traxxeo Check In At Work →
  3. 3
    Heras Smart Access

    Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.

    85 /100 Compare with Heras Smart Access →
  4. 4
    GeoDynamics

    Construction and installation companies that want presence, time and vehicles in one system.

    69 /100 Compare with GeoDynamics →
  5. 5
    Suivo

    Construction and infrastructure companies that want to link attendance, time registration and vehicles in one platform.

    54 /100 Compare with Suivo →
  6. 6
    Zen

    Main contractors that want to follow up attendance, subcontractors and access on large sites together.

    46 /100 Compare with Zen →
  7. 7
    CAME ACS01

    Construction sites that need physical access hardware with badge management, separate from the Checkinatwork registration.

    31 /100 Compare with CAME ACS01 →