Heras Smart Access vs Shyfter
Shyfter scores 57 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Shyfter meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Heras Smart Access | Shyfter |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 43 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | badge, terminal | app, qr |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | €39 / maand (Time tracking-plan; Check In&Out @Work is een betalende optie zonder publieke prijs) |
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.
-
Shyfter
Cleaning companies and shift work with changing rosters.