Hilti ON!Track vs Webfleet
Webfleet scores 7 points higher than Hilti ON!Track in construction equipment telematics on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: machines from different brands in one platform, track fuel consumption and geofence and theft alarms. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Hilti ON!Track | Webfleet |
|---|---|---|
| Construction equipment telematics | 62 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Machines from different brands in one platform | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Record operating hours and machine usage | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Track fuel consumption | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Geofence and theft alarms | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Open API or integrations with other software | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
Hilti ON!Track
Construction companies that want tools and heavy equipment in the same asset register.
-
Webfleet
Fleets of every size, from vans to lorries, looking for an international platform with many integrations.