Inriver vs Quable PIM
Quable PIM scores 16 points higher than Inriver in pim software (product information management) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: management of images and documents (DAM) and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Inriver | Quable PIM |
|---|---|---|
| PIM software (product information management) | 69 /100 | 85 /100 |
| ETIM classification | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Send product data to channels and data pools | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Management of images and documents (DAM) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Multilingual product content | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Inriver
Medium-sized and large manufacturers that publish product content to many channels and markets.
-
Quable PIM
Manufacturers of technical products that have to supply ETIM and FAB-DIS catalogues to wholesalers.