Octopus vs Yuki
Yuki scores 17 points higher than Octopus in peppol e-invoicing for smes on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Yuki meets, with a source: free version available.
No source for at least one of the two: mobile app. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Octopus | Yuki |
|---|---|---|
| Peppol e-invoicing for SMEs | 83 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Certified Peppol access point or connected through one | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Send and receive invoices via Peppol | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Free version available | No | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €10 / maand (Klantenportaal, jaarlijks gefactureerd) | €23,5 / maand (Small, 50 verwerkte facturen, incl. Peppol versturen) |
-
Octopus
Business owners whose accountant works with Octopus.
-
Yuki
SMEs whose accountant works with Yuki and that want Peppol in the accounting itself.