OpusFlow vs Virto.CAD
OpusFlow scores 77 points higher than Virto.CAD in software for solar panel and heat pump installers on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only OpusFlow meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French and price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: generate a quote or customer proposal, supports heat pump projects, CRM and sales follow-up and digital signature by the customer. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | OpusFlow | Virto.CAD |
|---|---|---|
| Software for solar panel and heat pump installers | 100 /100 | 23 /100 |
| Roof design and yield simulation for solar panels | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Generate a quote or customer proposal | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Supports heat pump projects | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| CRM and sales follow-up | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Digital signature by the customer | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | EN |
| Price from | €99 / gebruiker/maand (jaarbetaling, min. 3 licenties) | On request |
-
OpusFlow
Installers with several staff that want design, quoting and planning in one ERP-like package.
-
Virto.CAD
Designers and installers that make technical PV designs and draw up quotes in another system.