eWastra vs PTV Axylog
eWastra and PTV Axylog score the same in electronic consignment note apps (e-cmr). See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | eWastra | PTV Axylog |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic consignment note apps (e-CMR) | 91 /100 | 91 /100 |
| Electronic signature at loading and unloading | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Driver app for the consignment note | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a TMS or planning software | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
eWastra
Carriers and shippers that want to link e-CMR and waste documents in one platform to their ERP or TMS.
-
PTV Axylog
Shippers and carriers with their own and hired fleet that want execution, proof of delivery and e-CMR on one platform.