SAP Work Clearance Management vs TenForce
TenForce scores 15 points higher than SAP Work Clearance Management in permit to work systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: risk assessment linked to the permit, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | SAP Work Clearance Management | TenForce |
|---|---|---|
| Permit to work systems | 71 /100 | 86 /100 |
| Digital permits to work with an approval flow | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Isolation management (LOTO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Detection of conflicting works | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Risk assessment linked to the permit | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app in the field | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
SAP Work Clearance Management
Large industrial sites that already manage their maintenance in SAP and want to include permits to work in it.
-
TenForce
Chemical and process industry sites that want to manage work permits, isolations and SIMOPS in one EHSQ platform.