SoloProtect vs TWIG
SoloProtect scores 36 points higher than TWIG in lone worker and man-down solutions on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: monitoring by a 24/7 alarm centre, smartphone app, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | SoloProtect | TWIG |
|---|---|---|
| Lone worker and man-down solutions | 93 /100 | 57 /100 |
| Automatic man-down or fall detection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SOS button with alarm follow-up | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Monitoring by a 24/7 alarm centre | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Dedicated wearable device (not only a smartphone) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Smartphone app | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
SoloProtect
Organisations that want the device or app and 24/7 alarm handling from one vendor.
-
TWIG
Organisations looking for a dedicated wearable alarm device, also in versions for explosive atmospheres.