SynaptiQ vs Sitemark
SynaptiQ scores 23 points higher than Sitemark in solar monitoring software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works with inverters from different brands, controls a battery or consumption and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | SynaptiQ | Sitemark |
|---|---|---|
| Solar monitoring software | 69 /100 | 46 /100 |
| Works with inverters from different brands | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic alerts on faults or lower yield | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Several installations in one portal | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Controls a battery or consumption | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | EN | EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
SynaptiQ
Owners, asset managers and O&M companies with a portfolio of larger solar parks from different brands.
-
Sitemark
O&M teams and owners of large solar parks that want to manage inspections and maintenance work centrally.