All-Connects Checkin@Work vs Share@Work
All-Connects Checkin@Work scores 23 points higher than Share@Work in site access control systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | All-Connects Checkin@Work | Share@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Site access control systems | 92 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, qr, badge, terminal | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
All-Connects Checkin@Work
Construction companies that want to pay per registration and combine different registration methods per site.
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.