AutoCheckIn vs Heras Smart Access
AutoCheckIn scores 43 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only AutoCheckIn meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | AutoCheckIn | Heras Smart Access |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 86 /100 | 43 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | app, gps, qr | badge, terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR |
| Price from | €7 / gebruiker/maand (excl. btw) | On request |
-
AutoCheckIn
Small and medium-sized construction companies that want to register without badges or time clocks.
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.