AutoCheckIn vs Shyfter
Shyfter scores 14 points higher than AutoCheckIn in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | AutoCheckIn | Shyfter |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 86 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, gps, qr | app, qr |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €7 / gebruiker/maand (excl. btw) | €39 / maand (Time tracking-plan; Check In&Out @Work is een betalende optie zonder publieke prijs) |
-
AutoCheckIn
Small and medium-sized construction companies that want to register without badges or time clocks.
-
Shyfter
Cleaning companies and shift work with changing rosters.