Azumuta vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)
Azumuta scores 15 points higher than Mitti (by SafetyCulture) in quality management software (iso) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Mitti (by SafetyCulture) meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: document management with versions and approval and supports several ISO standards (9001, 14001, 45001). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Azumuta | Mitti (by SafetyCulture) |
|---|---|---|
| Quality management software (ISO) | 77 /100 | 62 /100 |
| Document management with versions and approval | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Non-conformities and corrective actions (CAPA) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Plan and carry out internal audits | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Supports several ISO standards (9001, 14001, 45001) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, EN, FR |
| Price from | On request | €24 / licentie/maand (USD, jaarlijks gefactureerd) |
-
Azumuta
Assembly companies that want to digitise paper work instructions and checks and collect shop floor data in the process.
-
Mitti (by SafetyCulture)
Teams that want to start quickly with digital checklists and reports without an implementation project.