Bumbal vs CargoLedger
Bumbal scores 33 points higher than CargoLedger in delivery and proof of delivery apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: customer automatically receives an ETA or track-and-trace, optimises multi-stop routes automatically, app works offline, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Bumbal | CargoLedger |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery and proof of delivery apps | 83 /100 | 50 /100 |
| Digital proof of delivery with signature and photo | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Customer automatically receives an ETA or track-and-trace | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Optimises multi-stop routes automatically | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Open API or standard integrations | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| App works offline | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €40,5 / voertuig/maand (jaarbetaling) | Unknown |
-
Bumbal
Deliverers of large or heavy goods that want to combine proof of delivery, customer communication and appointments.
-
CargoLedger
Shippers and carriers that want to keep a complete evidence file per shipment alongside the e-CMR.