CAME ACS01 vs Zen
Zen scores 15 points higher than CAME ACS01 in site access control systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works with turnstiles or gates on site, reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID, registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO, checks on subcontractors and certificates and mobile app for site managers. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | CAME ACS01 | Zen |
|---|---|---|
| Site access control systems | 31 /100 | 46 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | app, badge |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
CAME ACS01
Construction sites that need physical access hardware with badge management, separate from the Checkinatwork registration.
-
Zen
Main contractors that want to follow up attendance, subcontractors and access on large sites together.