Cooperlink vs Qonic
Cooperlink scores 8 points higher than Qonic in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Cooperlink meets, with a source: document management according to ISO 19650.
Only Qonic meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Cooperlink | Qonic |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 85 /100 | 77 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | No |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | EN |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
Cooperlink
Contractors and clients that want to manage document flows and BIM coordination across several parties and existing tools.
-
Qonic
Design and BIM teams that want to share and edit IFC models in the browser without a BIM licence for every project partner.