Heras Smart Access vs Share@Work
Heras Smart Access scores 16 points higher than Share@Work in site access control systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO, mobile app for site managers and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Heras Smart Access | Share@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Site access control systems | 85 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | badge, terminal | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.