Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Quentic
Mitti (by SafetyCulture) scores 7 points higher than Quentic in qhse software and lmra apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Mitti (by SafetyCulture) meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: works offline and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Mitti (by SafetyCulture) | Quentic |
|---|---|---|
| QHSE software and LMRA apps | 92 /100 | 85 /100 |
| Inspections and checklists, including LMRA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Report and follow up incidents and near misses | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Follow-up of actions | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN, FR | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €24 / licentie/maand (USD, jaarlijks gefactureerd) | Unknown |
-
Mitti (by SafetyCulture)
Teams that want to start quickly with digital checklists and reports without an implementation project.
-
Quentic
Industrial sites that want to digitise safety instructions for external parties within their EHS platform.