9ID vs Share@Work
9ID scores 8 points higher than Share@Work in contractor management software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only 9ID meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: online safety induction, withholding obligation check (NSSO and tax authorities) and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | 9ID | Share@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Contractor management software | 77 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Prequalification of contractors | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Tracking of certificates and expiry dates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration and access on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Online safety induction | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Withholding obligation check (NSSO and tax authorities) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | EN | NL |
| Price from | €200 / maand (credits per controle) | Unknown |
-
9ID
Manufacturing and logistics sites with many external contractors and drivers that want to automate verification and access.
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.