Onyx One vs Share@Work
Onyx One scores 8 points higher than Share@Work in contractor management software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: online safety induction, withholding obligation check (NSSO and tax authorities), works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Onyx One | Share@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Contractor management software | 77 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Prequalification of contractors | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Tracking of certificates and expiry dates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration and access on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Online safety induction | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Withholding obligation check (NSSO and tax authorities) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Onyx One
Industrial and chemical sites that want to qualify, train and register contractors before they pass the gate.
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.