SciSure (eLabNext) vs SampleManager LIMS
SampleManager LIMS scores 23 points higher than SciSure (eLabNext) in lims (laboratory information management systems) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: supports working to ISO 17025, customer portal for results, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | SciSure (eLabNext) | SampleManager LIMS |
|---|---|---|
| LIMS (laboratory information management systems) | 54 /100 | 77 /100 |
| Sample management from receipt to report | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Supports working to ISO 17025 | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Link with laboratory instruments | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Audit trail for data integrity | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Customer portal for results | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
SciSure (eLabNext)
Research labs in life sciences that want a notebook and sample management together.
-
SampleManager LIMS
Environmental, water, industrial and pharmaceutical labs looking for a configurable enterprise LIMS.