T-Report vs WerfCheck
T-Report scores 7 points higher than WerfCheck in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only T-Report meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
No source for at least one of the two: more than one registration method and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | T-Report | WerfCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 86 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, gps | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | €7,6 / persoon/maand (basisabonnement; Check-in@Work en Check-in/Out zijn betalende opties zonder publieke prijs) | €5 / gebruiker/maand |
-
T-Report
Construction, installation and service companies that want scheduling, hours and Checkinatwork in one tool, with export to Acerta, Partena, Group S or Liantis.
-
WerfCheck
Small Flemish construction companies looking for a simple app without hardware.