CAME ACS01 vs Share@Work
Share@Work scores 38 points higher than CAME ACS01 in site access control systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID, registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO, checks on subcontractors and certificates, mobile app for site managers and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | CAME ACS01 | Share@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Site access control systems | 31 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
CAME ACS01
Construction sites that need physical access hardware with badge management, separate from the Checkinatwork registration.
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.