Share@Work vs Suivo
Share@Work scores 15 points higher than Suivo in site access control systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works with turnstiles or gates on site, registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO, checks on subcontractors and certificates and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Share@Work | Suivo |
|---|---|---|
| Site access control systems | 69 /100 | 54 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app for site managers | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | app, terminal, badge |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Share@Work
Main contractors that want to link the check of the subcontracting chain to access to the site.
-
Suivo
Construction and infrastructure companies that want to link attendance, time registration and vehicles in one platform.